Skip to content
Free violation report for any NYC building · Check an address

Leasing & tenant law · Owners & management · 10/22/2026

Landlord rejects $6,000 one-shot, demands legal fees from city

A longtime NYC owner told The Real Deal that HRA one-shot deals cover back rent but not the legal fees from nonpayment cases, which he says typically eat 15 to 20 percent of each payment. One tenant stopped paying again after a $33,000 one-shot. When the city offered a second, $6,000 one-shot, he refused and said he will go to trial to seek legal fees.

Reported by The Real Deal · New YorkRead the original ↗

Photo: The Real Deal

What happened

A column in The Real Deal, published October 22, 2026, relays the views of one longtime New York City landlord who blames two programs for weak rent collection: the state's Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP) and the one-shot deals the city's Human Resources Administration (HRA) gives to tenants behind on rent. The landlord is not named. The column says city landlords almost universally blame government programs, agencies and a slow eviction process. Some also cite tenants' money problems and inflation.

On ERAP, the landlord said he warned legislators that tenants should have been required to pay 30 percent of the rent. ERAP checks came with a year-long rent freeze. He estimates that 60 percent of his tenants who got ERAP money were $5,000 behind again six months later. The column notes that tenants with a pending ERAP application could not be evicted, and that the program ran out of money and was shut down.

On one-shots, the landlord says he does get back rent paid, but loses money on legal fees, which HRA does not cover. He says his legal fees typically equal 15 to 20 percent of each one-shot. In one case, a tenant paying $658 a month stopped paying. After four or five years and nearly two dozen court appearances, the city paid about $33,000 to cover 50 months of rent. His legal bills were $5,000 to $6,000. That works out to about $550 a month in rent after fees. The tenant never resumed paying. Three months later he filed a new case. Six months after that, the city offered another one-shot of $6,000. He says he is refusing it, wants his legal fees, and will go to trial, though he expects the judge will not award them.

The column cites other figures. Rent Guidelines Board chair Chantella Mitchell said last spring that one-shot payments rose from $102 million in fiscal 2022 to more than $540 million in fiscal 2024, then to $556 million in fiscal 2025. Mitchell cited this as evidence tenants could not afford rent. The columnist argues the rise reflects tenants learning they could get one-shots by not paying. Gothamist reported that about three-quarters of one-shot applications were denied in the first three months of the Mamdani administration. The column says applicants often reapply until approved. The landlord says some of his tenants have received two, three and four one-shots. He also says that in the last two months he lost two tenants who each owed $100,000, with rents of $2,300 and $3,900.

Key facts

Source
The Real Deal column, published October 22, 2026
Agency
Human Resources Administration (HRA) awards one-shot deals
One-shot spending
$102 million in fiscal 2022, more than $540 million in fiscal 2024, $556 million in fiscal 2025, per Rent Guidelines Board chair Chantella Mitchell
Denial rate
About three-quarters of one-shot applications denied in the first three months of the Mamdani administration, per Gothamist
Example case
$658 monthly rent; about $33,000 paid by the city for 50 months of arrears
Legal fees
$5,000 to $6,000 in that case, not reimbursed by the city; typically 15 to 20 percent of each one-shot, per the landlord
Second offer
$6,000 one-shot offered after a new case; landlord says he is refusing it and will go to trial
ERAP
State program; checks came with a year-long rent freeze; program ran out of money and was shut down

What it means

Landlords

A one-shot can clear arrears, but the legal fees from a nonpayment case are not covered by HRA. Owners should count those costs and the time in court when deciding whether to accept a one-shot or keep litigating.

Tenants and voucher holders

A one-shot pays arrears but does not stop new arrears from building. The column says recipients are technically supposed to repay the city. A landlord may also file a new case if rent stops again.

Caseworkers

Landlords may push back on one-shot offers that do not cover their legal fees, as this owner says he is doing. That can slow or block a settlement, so it helps to plan for ongoing rent payment, not just the arrears.

The highlights

  1. One-shot payouts grew from $102 million in fiscal 2022 to $556 million in fiscal 2025.
  2. A $658-a-month tenant's one-shot paid about $33,000 to cover 50 months of rent.
  3. HRA did not reimburse that case's legal fees of $5,000 to $6,000.

Why it matters Landlords

HRA one-shots can clear arrears, but owners often absorb the court and legal costs of nonpayment cases.

What to do: Track legal costs on nonpayment cases, since one-shot payments do not cover them.

Not known yet

  • Who the landlord is, and where and how many units he owns
  • Whether HRA or the city responded to the claims in the column
  • How the trial over the $6,000 offer and legal fees turns out
  • Whether the landlord's estimates, such as the 60 percent ERAP figure, were independently checked

Background

In New York City, a one-shot deal is an emergency assistance grant from HRA that can pay rent arrears for tenants facing eviction or a utility shutoff. Applicants usually must show they can afford the rent going forward, and some grants must be repaid. Landlords who are not paid typically bring a nonpayment case in Housing Court, and those cases often involve several court dates before they settle or go to trial.

Summary written by Bulwark from The Real Deal · New York’s reporting. The original story is at therealdeal.com. This is general information, not legal advice.

Brooklyn, NY

Questions about what this means for your lease?

We manage and lease buildings across the five boroughs and keep owners on the right side of tenant law.

Photo: Andre Carrotflower, CC BY-SA 4.0
WhatsApp us