Leasing & tenant law · 10/15/2026
Williamsburg Tenants Sue Spitzer Enterprises Over Alleged Rent Overcharges
A class-action lawsuit filed Wednesday says Spitzer Enterprises overcharged rent-stabilized tenants at 420 Kent Avenue, an 857-unit building in Williamsburg. Tenants allege the company calculated lease increases on the higher legal rent instead of their lower preferential rents. The Housing Rights Initiative estimates the alleged overcharges since 2020 could reach $30 million.
Reported by PatchRead the original ↗

What happened
Tenants at 420 Kent Avenue in Williamsburg have filed a class-action lawsuit against Spitzer Enterprises, the real estate company run by former Gov. and Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. Patch reported the suit was filed Wednesday. The building sits at the corner of Kent Avenue and South 8th Street and has 857 units.
The suit says the company broke state rent-stabilization law when it calculated renewal increases. Instead of applying increases to tenants' lower preferential rents, the company allegedly applied them to the higher legal rent. The Real Deal reported that the 2019 Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act requires increases to be applied to the preferential rent. It also reported that the rent-stabilized units were developed using the since-lapsed 421a tax break. Patch noted that over the past decade, the Rent Guidelines Board has never approved an increase above 3.25 percent for a one-year lease.
The Housing Rights Initiative, a nonprofit led by founder and executive director Aaron Carr, estimates tenants could be owed $30 million. Patch reported the estimate covers alleged overcharges from 2020 through the filing of the suit. The Real Deal, citing the New York Times, reported that Spitzer said his company plans to "litigate the case hard" and that the complaint seemed to come out of the blue. The Real Deal also reported that Spitzer secured a $386 million refinancing from KKR for the building in 2019.
Both outlets tied the case to an earlier, similar suit, but they describe its timing differently. Patch described a suit filed last month that accused two Downtown Brooklyn properties of using temporary rent concessions to raise rents beyond legal limits. The Real Deal described a suit filed two months ago, also based on Housing Rights Initiative research. That suit alleges "net effective" rents were used to inflate base rents, producing renewal increases as high as 20 percent. It seeks class status for more than 3,500 tenants. Assemblymember Emily Gallagher said, "This is not the only building where this is happening."
Key facts
- Address
- 420 Kent Avenue, at Kent Avenue and South 8th Street, Williamsburg, Brooklyn
- Units
- 857
- Defendant
- Spitzer Enterprises, run by former Gov. Eliot Spitzer
- Filed
- Wednesday, per Patch; class-action lawsuit
- Alleged violation
- Renewal increases applied to legal rent instead of preferential rent
- Estimated owed
- $30 million, per Housing Rights Initiative, covering 2020 through filing
- Tax program
- Rent-stabilized units developed under the since-lapsed 421a tax break, per The Real Deal
- RGB cap context
- No one-year increase above 3.25 percent in the past decade, per Patch
What it means
Landlords
Owners with stabilized tenants paying preferential rents should check how renewal increases are calculated. This suit and the earlier one both turn on what base rent the percentage increase is applied to.
Tenants and voucher holders
Stabilized tenants paying a preferential rent can compare past renewal increases against the base they were applied to and the Rent Guidelines Board caps. Tenants at 420 Kent may fall within the proposed class, though the material does not say who is covered.
Caseworkers
For clients in stabilized buildings with preferential rents or past concessions, review renewal leases to see whether increases were calculated on the lower rent. Overcharges could affect what a household or subsidy has been paying.
The highlights
- The class action covers 420 Kent Avenue, an 857-unit building in Williamsburg.
- Suit says increases were figured on legal rent, not tenants' lower preferential rents.
- Housing Rights Initiative estimates tenants could be owed $30 million since 2020.
Why it matters Landlords
Landlords with preferential-rent leases face costly overcharge claims if renewal increases are calculated on the wrong base rent.
What to do: Review how renewal increases are calculated on any preferential-rent leases.
Not known yet
- Which court the suit was filed in and what happens next in the case
- Whether a class has been certified and which tenants it would include
- How much individual tenants were allegedly overcharged
- Whether any tenants filed overcharge complaints with HCR
Background
In New York, a preferential rent is a rent the landlord charges that is lower than the legal regulated rent on file for a rent-stabilized apartment. The Rent Guidelines Board sets the maximum percentage increases for one- and two-year renewal leases each year. Under the 2019 Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act, renewal increases for a tenant paying a preferential rent are generally calculated on that preferential rent for the length of the tenancy. Tenants who believe they were overcharged can file a complaint with the state's housing agency, HCR, or pursue the claim in court.
Also drawn from: Eliot Spitzer’s Williamsburg tenants lodge 421a rent hike lawsuit (The Real Deal · New York)
Summary written by Bulwark from Patch’s reporting. The original story is at patch.com. This is general information, not legal advice.
Related
Follow Bulwark on WhatsApp
Deadline countdowns, rule changes, voucher rents and breaking NYC housing news in your WhatsApp Updates. Free.
Send the message that opens, then save our number. WhatsApp only shows updates from saved contacts.
Brooklyn, NY
Questions about what this means for your lease?
We manage and lease buildings across the five boroughs and keep owners on the right side of tenant law.
Photo: Andre Carrotflower, CC BY-SA 4.0