Skip to content
Free violation report for any NYC building · Check an address

Leasing & tenant law · 10/15/2026

Williamsburg tenants sue Spitzer over rent hikes at 420 Kent Avenue

Tenants at 420 Kent Avenue, an 857-unit Williamsburg building developed by Spitzer Enterprises with the 421a tax break, filed a class-action suit alleging overcharges. They say renewal increases were applied to the full rent instead of the preferential rent, as the 2019 Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act requires. Spitzer said the company will litigate the case hard.

Reported by The Real Deal · New YorkRead the original ↗

Photo: The Real Deal

What happened

Tenants at 420 Kent Avenue in Williamsburg have filed a class-action lawsuit against Spitzer Enterprises, the real estate company run by former New York Governor and Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. They claim the company overcharged rent-stabilized tenants. Patch reported the suit was filed Wednesday. The Real Deal, citing The New York Times, reported that Housing Rights Initiative founder and executive director Aaron Carr led the tenant effort. These are allegations in a lawsuit, not findings by a court.

The tenants say the company calculated lease renewal increases on the full legal rent instead of the lower preferential rent tenants actually paid. The Real Deal reported that the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019 requires increases to be applied to the preferential rent. It also reported that the preferential rent at this building reflects concessions such as free months when a lease is first signed. Spitzer built the rent-stabilized units at 420 Kent using the since-lapsed 421a tax abatement program.

The Housing Rights Initiative estimates tenants could be owed $30 million. Patch reported that this figure covers alleged overcharges from 2020 through the filing of the lawsuit. Spitzer told the Times his company planned to "litigate the case hard" and said the complaint seemed to come out of the blue. The Real Deal reported that Spitzer got a $386 million refinancing package from KKR for the 857-unit building in 2019.

Both outlets tied the case to an earlier, similar lawsuit, but they describe it differently. The Real Deal said a suit filed two months ago also relied on Carr's group's research. It said that suit alleges a landlord used "net effective" rents to set high base rents, which led to renewal increases as high as 20 percent, and that it seeks class status for over 3,500 tenants. Patch said a similar suit filed last month in Downtown Brooklyn accused two properties of using temporary concessions to raise rents beyond legal limits. Separately, The Real Deal reported that state housing regulators (HCR) granted Spitzer's application not to renew rent-stabilized leases at 985 Fifth Avenue. He had sued the agency over delays. He plans to demolish that building and put up a 20-story, 26-unit condominium.

Key facts

Address
420 Kent Avenue, at Kent Avenue and South 8th Street, Williamsburg, Brooklyn
Units
857
Defendant
Spitzer Enterprises (Eliot Spitzer)
Filed
Wednesday, per Patch (class action)
Alleged overcharges
Up to $30 million from 2020 through filing, per Housing Rights Initiative estimate
Core claim
Renewal increases applied to full legal rent instead of preferential rent
Law cited
Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019
Tax program
Since-lapsed 421a abatement

What it means

Landlords

Owners of rent-stabilized units with preferential rents should check that renewal increases are calculated on the preferential rent, not the legal rent. Advocates are filing overcharge suits on this theory against several buildings.

Tenants and voucher holders

If your lease shows both a legal rent and a lower preferential rent, compare your renewal increase to the Rent Guidelines Board rate applied to the preferential rent. Patch noted the board has not approved more than 3.25 percent for a one-year lease in the past decade.

Caseworkers

For clients in rent-stabilized or 421a buildings, review renewal leases for large jumps from a preferential rent. Tenants can request a rent history from HCR to check past increases.

The highlights

  1. Tenants say increases were applied to full rent, not the lower preferential rent.
  2. Housing Rights Initiative's Aaron Carr estimates tenants may be owed $30 million.
  3. The 857-unit building was developed with the since-lapsed 421a tax abatement.

Why it matters Landlords

Owners of stabilized units with preferential rents face class-action risk if renewal increases are calculated on the full rent.

What to do: Check that renewal increases on stabilized units are applied to the preferential rent.

Not known yet

  • Which court the case was filed in
  • How many tenants the proposed class covers at 420 Kent
  • How much individual tenants were allegedly overcharged
  • Whether the court will certify the class and when the company must respond

Background

In New York, a preferential rent is a rent a landlord charges that is lower than the legal regulated rent for a stabilized apartment. Since the 2019 rent law, a preferential rent generally stays in place for the tenancy, and renewal increases are applied to it using the Rent Guidelines Board's yearly rates. Buildings built with the 421a tax benefit often include rent-stabilized units. Tenants who think they were overcharged can file a complaint with the state's Homes and Community Renewal (HCR) or sue in court. Overcharges found to be willful can bring added damages.

Also drawn from: Brooklyn Rent-Stabilized Tenants Sue Spitzer Enterprises Over Alleged Overcharges (Patch) · Eliot Spitzer’s Real Estate Firm Overcharged Tenants, Lawsuit Claims (The New York Times)

Summary written by Bulwark from The Real Deal · New York’s reporting. The original story is at therealdeal.com. This is general information, not legal advice.

Brooklyn, NY

Questions about what this means for your lease?

We manage and lease buildings across the five boroughs and keep owners on the right side of tenant law.

Photo: Andre Carrotflower, CC BY-SA 4.0
WhatsApp us